Certainly the Apostle Paul possessed this type of “courage to be.” His life was a continual round of disappointments. On every side were broken plans and shattered dreams. Planning to visit Spain, he was consigned to a Roman prison. Hoping to go to Bithynia, he was sidetracked to Troas. His gallant mission for Christ was measured “in journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils of mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren.” Did he permit these conditions to master him? “I have learned,” he testified, “in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content.” Not that Paul had learned to be complacent, for nothing in his life characterizes him as a complacent individual. In his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Edward Gibbon records, “Paul has done more to promote the idea of freedom and liberty than any man who set foot on western soil.” Does this sound like complacency? Nor did he learn resignation to inscrutable fate. By discovering the distinction between spiritual tranquility and the outward accidents of circumstance, Paul learned to stand tall and without despairing amid the disappointments of life.